statin holiday
Last reviewed 02/2022
For patients who cannot tolerate statin therapy, alternatives include a 'statin holiday' followed by a rechallenge with a different statin
Use of a statin holiday
- if there is 'statin intolerance' then one management option suggested is
to prescribe a 6-week 'statin holiday' and see if symptoms resolve
- the process of atherosclerotic plaque formation is one that occurs over months and years rather than weeks and therefore it is reasonable (in most cases) to suspend statin therapy for a 6 week period - the suspension of statin therapy is controversial if unstable coronary disease although Fernandez et al (1) suggest statin therapy can be halted for a maximum of 6 weeks in this situation
- if statins are also for the management of high triglycerides then this
makes the undertaking of a 'statin holiday' problematic because of the
more immediate risk of pancreatitis associated with raised triglycerides
- if there is any doubt about the suitability of the use of a 'statin
holiday' then consult expert advice
- in patients whose evaluation suggests statin myopathy, a statin holiday
indicates stopping all lipid-lowering therapy for 6 weeks and seeing if symptoms
resolve
- grip and hip strength increases can be assessed by dynamometry
- grip and hip strength increases can be assessed by dynamometry
- some give these patient supplements of 600 mg daily of a bioavailable source
of coenzyme Q10 and fish oil during this statin holiday (1)
- data supporting the use of these supplements are mixed but the risks
are minimal
- data supporting the use of these supplements are mixed but the risks
are minimal
- if symptoms do not resolve after a 6-week course of the coenzyme Q10 and
fish oil
- it has been suggested (1) that if symptoms persist or if resolution
is unclear at 6 weeks
- extend the holiday for an additional 6 weeks, except in patients
with recent unstable coronary disease: for these patients, unless
there is evidence of rhabdomyolysis, we believe that the benefits
of continued statin therapy exceed the risks
- extend the holiday for an additional 6 weeks, except in patients
with recent unstable coronary disease: for these patients, unless
there is evidence of rhabdomyolysis, we believe that the benefits
of continued statin therapy exceed the risks
- it has been suggested (1) that if symptoms persist or if resolution
is unclear at 6 weeks
- if the initial evaluation is consistent with statin myopathy and the neuromuscular
symptoms (myalgias and weakness) do not respond within a few months of statin
withdrawal
- specialist review is indicated to evaluate for an underlying muscular
or neurologic disorder that has become symptomatic during statin therapy
but whose existence is independent of the statin therapy
- in some cases, the preexisting disorder may become symptomatic because of the statin therapy and remain symptomatic despite discontinuation of the statin therapy
- specialist review is indicated to evaluate for an underlying muscular
or neurologic disorder that has become symptomatic during statin therapy
but whose existence is independent of the statin therapy
- if 'statin holiday' has led to symptomatic resolution then alternative options
for management include:
- careful rechallenge with a different statin, use of same statin but at lower dose, intermittent use of a long acting statin such as rosuvastatin
Reference:
myopathy associated with statin treatment ( HMG CoA reductase inhibitors )